A CEO’s Point of View: Children as Products for Corporate Consumers

Business Gets Schooled, a long piece in the January 1, 2016, issue of Fortune, perches the reader as a fly on the wall of the corporate board room during a conversation among CEOs about public education.  This blog has argued that while public schools are the quintessential institution of the 99 Percent, education policy is being made by the One Percent.  Business Gets Schooled explains how that works.

The reporter, Peter Elkind—whose point of view dovetails nicely with the thinking of the business executives he is profiling—describes the involvement of Bill Gates, Exxon Mobil’s Rex Tillerson, and IBM’s Lou Gerstner, without even wondering what these people know that qualifies them for imposing the Common Core standards on the schools. One wonders if the corporate giants who hatched the standards ever leave their offices to spend time with their own children or grandchildren. As profiled in this piece, they do not acknowledge the existence of a credentialed education profession or of a vast body of academic literature on child and adolescent psychology or learning styles or the role of family economics in educational success. Neither does Elkind seem to know about any of this.

Exxon Mobil’s Tillerson stands out. For him schools are a kind of machine:  “I’m not sure public schools understand that we’re their customer—that we, the business community, are your customer… What they don’t understand is they are producing a product at the end of that high school graduation… Now is that product in a form that we, the customer, can use it?  Or is it defective, and we’re not interested? (American schools) have got to step up the performance level—or they’re basically turning out defective products that have no future.  Unfortunately, the defective products are human beings.  So it’s really serious.  It’s tragic.  But that’s where we find ourselves today.”

Here is how Elkind desribes the genesis of the Common Core Standards: “In truth, Common Core might not exist without the corporate community.  The nation’s business establishment has been clamoring for more rigorous education standards—ones that would apply across the entire nation—for years.  It views them as desperately needed to prepare America’s future workforce and to bolster its global competitiveness.  One measure of the deep involvement of corporate leaders: The Common Core standards were drafted by determining the skills that businesses (and colleges) need and then working backward to decide what students should learn.”  “When it came time to draft the provisions, career readiness was a central focus.  The writers spent their first two months learning what colleges and businesses wanted high school graduates to know by the time they arrived on their doorstep.  From there, the writers ‘back mapped,’ crafting grade-by-grade benchmarks to get them there.”

We learn in this piece that Achieve, Inc. the non-profit that has faithfully promoted the corporate reform agenda, was founded in 1996 with help from Lou Gerstner, IBM’s CEO: “To CEOs, the issue has always been a no-brainer.  In an increasingly global economy, what sense does it make for America to have 50 different sets of education standards?  Gerstner helped establish a nonprofit called Achieve Inc. in 1996 to promote education reform.  With a board filled with governors and CEOs, the group served over the next two decades as a sort of lab for the national standards movement.”

Threading through Elkind’s piece is documentation of the role of Bill Gates and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation : “The Gates Foundation would help bankroll virtually every aspect of Common Core’s development, promotion and implementation.  ‘This is like having a common electrical system,’ Gates told the Wall Street Journal in 2011.  ‘It just makes sense to me.'” The Gates Foundation is described as having spent more than $220 million over the years on in the entire development and roll-out of the Common Core. We learn that the Gates Foundation invested $27.9 million on the Collaborative for Student Success, a public relations firm whose purpose was, “to spin news about Common Core and respond fiercely to opponents’ charges.”  The Gates Foundation even paid a think tank for a positive evaluation of the program being developed: “The most detailed appraisal (funded with $959,116 in Gates Foundation money) was conducted by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute…. Its 370-page analysis found the Core standards ‘clearly superior’ to those in place in ‘the vast majority of states.'”

There are a lot of scary assumptions in this article.  But what frightens me most is realizing that the conversation in the corporate board room and the conversation in the education establishment—the public schools and the universities where educational research is conducted and published and where teachers are trained—do not overlap at all.  This report makes it pretty clear that the One Percenters using their power and their money to shape the public schools that serve 50 million of our children have very little understanding of the operation of schools or the realities that challenge educators.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “A CEO’s Point of View: Children as Products for Corporate Consumers

  1. I remember a conversation I had the first time I met with then Governor Tom Vilsack of Iowa. I noted that at the recent meeting (back in 2006?) of the National Governors’ Association on education, each Governor had shown up with a business executive. He acknowledged that was true. I asked why not instead show up with an educator – a teacher, a principal, even a superintendent or school board member? He was almost stunned, but admitted he had never thought of that possibility.

  2. Jan – As usual you hit the target. These “businesspeople” convict themselves out of their own mouths. Their use of words like “products” and “workforce” would make it clear how they regard the essential purposes of public education even had one of them (whom you quote) not declared that business stands in relation to public schools as customer to provider. There is no more blatant distortion of what public schools should be and do than what this statement reveals. Of course the business community has a stake in high quality education, but that stake is marginal in comparison with the interests of the students themselves, their parents, and the civil society at large. Truly, we ALL have a stake in public education, and educators–the trained and experienced professionals who know what they are doing and try their best to fulfill their responsibilities–are far too often ignored or overridden by self-styled “reformers” and moneyed interests who know little and care less about the larger and more lasting benefits of first-rate education. Thanks for your good work!

  3. What you have exposed here is such a travesty that I hardly can think where to begin. That the business community seeks its own ends is no surprise, but that government has colluded with multi-national corporations in a scheme that wreaks havoc with public schools, one of our most vital and cherished public institutions, and simultaneously does harm to millions of children’s psyches, is unconscionable. Today I happened to read an article about the education of medical students. The tremendous stress that they are put under–the sleeplessness, the relentless responsibility, and the bullying from their superiors, results in depression and in tragic cases, suicide. This is terrible for the young doctors, and is also terrible for their patients. For what? This is the mentality that values “rigorous” training, and “sucking it up,” rather than admitting distress and seeking help. This fits better with the training of Marines than the training of healers. And this is the mentality that has now been transferred to public education, and to even the youngest students. What is wrong with us that we can’t seem to put a stop to it?

  4. Pingback: A CEO’s Point of View: Children as Products for Corporate Consumers | PAChurchesAdvocacy.org

  5. Pingback: Stop Blaming Public Schools for Jobless Economy | janresseger

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s