The Power of Money in Public Education Policy

Last week Politico Magazine published a stunning  excerpt about public education from Bob Herbert’s new book, Losing Our Way.  This blog covered that piece hereThe excerpt was so good that I went right out, bought a copy of the book, and began reading. The book covers far more about public education than the short excerpt that was reprinted; it also covers public education in the context of a number of other big problems—our nation’s crumbling infrastructure, a long and tragic employment crisis, our propensity to engage in debilitating wars—all in the context of the “poisonous effects of wealth and income inequality.”  Herbert writes:

“The corporations, banks, hedge funds, and other wealthy interests had powerful armies of special pleaders—lobbyists, lawyers, fund-raisers, public relations executives—fighting day and night to shape government policies to their liking.  Those armies and the endless billions of dollars in campaign contributions and other favors so lavishly distributed by the elites have corrupted the democratic process to the extent that ordinary individuals have virtually no say in how the nation and its economy are run.” (Losing Our Way, p. 63)

I remembered this passage as I scanned recent news about education—

A new post on Diane Ravitch’s Blog, The Astonishing Cost of Eva Moskowitz’s Success Academies: According to Ravitch, a Freedom of Information Act request has turned up information that, because of a law passed by the New York legislature last spring, the New York Public Schools must house charter schools for free or pay rent for the charters in other facilities.  New York City will lease space at a rate of $39 per square foot in a former Catholic high school for Success Academy Washington Heights and pay the same rate for space to house Success Academy Harlem Central, because the school district does not have public school classrooms to spare in the neighborhoods where these charter schools are to be located. According to Ravitch, charter schools in New York receive annual public operating funds at a rate of $13,777 per student, and the rental expenditures will be added on top of the already generous per-pupil set-aside.

From Joy Resomovits, the education writer for the Huffington Post: “Success Academy, the high-profile chain of charter schools famous for its clashes with New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (D), is taking its fight beyond the nation’s largest school system.  After a tumultuous year, filings show that Success is being represented by lobbyists in Washington… According to lobbying disclosures posted this summer but not previously reported, the schools hired two affiliated Washington-based firms, EdNexus Advisors and Thompson Coburn, L.L.P.  The expenditure for EdNexus is listed as ‘less than $5,000,’ and Thompson Coburn’s is $10,000.  Those are relatively small expenditures, suggesting that Success might be trying out the firms.  The disclosures specify lobbying around the components of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act that concern charter schools… Several sources in Washington said they expect the well-funded school organization to use its newly established presence in Washington to advocate for an increase in federal charter school funding.  Sources also suggested that Moskowitz could be looking to get Success accredited as an independent certifier of teachers.”

Here is a short history of key news about Success Academy charter schools in recent years:

October 2014:  In New York, Eva Moskowitz—the politically connected former city councilwoman, the darling of  hedge fund tycoons, and the CEO of the Success Academies that pay her an annual salary of $500,000—just got 14 more schools authorized to open next year.  According to the NY Times, “The state’s charter schools committee, part of State University of New York’s board of trustees, approved 14 new Success Academy schools, which will bring the network to a total of 50 schools serving 16,300 students by 2016…”

First week of October 2014:  The approval followed a half-million dollar TV advertising campaign, Don’t Steal Possible,  that splashed across New York before the vote by the SUNY trustees.  And once again, Moskowitz had closed her schools in early October and staged a major rally of students, parents, and teachers.

March 2014: When New York City’s new mayor Bill de Blasio threatened to deny co-location privileges for two of Moskowitz’s schools into already crowded public schools where the charters would displace programs serving the public school students, Moskowitz closed her charter schools for a day, took thousands of students and parents and teachers to Albany to protest, got donations from wealthy benefactors that enabled her to spend $3.6 million for a lavish TV advertising campaign, and got Governor Andrew Cuomo to pressure the  legislature to pass the law that requires the New York City schools to find space for charters in public school buildings (rent-free) or to reimburse the charters for the rent they must pay in other facilities.  Many have wondered why Governor Cuomo was so anxious to speak up for charters, when the majority of the parents of New York City’s 1.1 million students (and parents across the state of New York) depend on traditional public schools.   For the answer to this question it is essential to follow the money.  Cuomo has depended on the pro-charter PAC, Democrats for Education Reform (DFER).  DFER was founded by hedge fund managers who have been among the strongest supporters of New York City’s charter schools.  According to a January 2014 report from Chalkbeat New York, DFER had (by that date) contributed $35,000 to Governor Cuomo’s re-election campaign.  John Petrey,  a co-founder of DFER had donated $35,000 and Whitney Tilson another co-founder of DFER, $12,000.  Eva Moskowitz’s own PAC, Great Public Schools, had donated $65,000.  Members of the board of Moskowitz’s Success Academy Charter schools who had already contributed generously to Cuomo’s re-election campaign include Sam Cole ($30,000), Bryan Binder ($15,000), Jill Braufman ($57,500), Dan and Margaret Loeb ($29,367), Joel and Julia Greenblatt ($75,000), Dan Nir ($35,000), Charles Staunch ($15,000), Jarrett Posner ($2,500), and Andrea and Dana Stone ($75,000).

Back in 2012: Moskowitz got the SUNY authorizing board to grant a 50 percent increase in the tax-generated per-pupil management fee to Success Academy Charter Schools despite that the Success Network had posted a year-end surplus of $23.5 million and spent nearly $883,119 on publicity and student recruitment in that year including fees of $243,150 to SKD Knickerbocker, a prominent pubic relations firm led by Anita Dunn, the former communications director for the Obama White House, and $129,000 to another Washington, D.C. consulting firm.

While I have just begun reading Bob Herbert’s new book, and although I have not yet reached the chapters that cover the current state of public education, I think he is onto something: “The corporations, banks, hedge funds, and other wealthy interests had powerful armies of special pleaders—lobbyists, lawyers, fund-raisers, public relations executives—fighting day and night to shape government policies to their liking.  Those armies and the endless billions of dollars in campaign contributions and other favors so lavishly distributed by the elites have corrupted the democratic process to the extent that ordinary individuals have virtually no say in how the nation and its economy are run.”

Remember, once the 14 new Success Academy charter schools just authorized by the SUNY board of trustees are up and running, Success Academy Schools will have the capacity to serve 16,300 students.  The New York City Schools are responsible for serving 1.1 million students. Too often the advocates for these 1.1 million children lack the kind of resources Moskowitz can summon to promote her much smaller network of schools.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “The Power of Money in Public Education Policy

  1. Jan, Keep holding their feet to the fire! I appreciate your advocating for public
    school teachers and students. Rev. Ron Hooker

  2. thank you so much for the illustrations, examples, and details. I have been reading “Waking the Frog” about climate change and he says the so-called free market (an illusion) is not capable of sorting out and responding to climate change; I feel this is a similar issue. Thanks again for all you do; keep up the work because we need you!!!!

  3. The boiling frog story is a good metaphor for climate change as Jean alludes to in her comments, and it also applies to the public and the public’s school system, historically a wonderful example of democracy at the local level. As the attacks continue on our educational system the public, for the most part, is either unaware or not concerned enough to take the action necessary to be beat back the school vandals known as venture capitalists. The water is slowly heating across the country, and once it has reached the boiling point it may be too late to save the schools we once knew. It is stunning to think that the major chef turning up the heat is a President from the Democratic Party assisted by his chosen cook in the kitchen, Arne Duncan.

  4. Pingback: Charter Schools: Too Often Punitive, Impersonal, Corrupt, Unregulated | janresseger

  5. Pingback: New Allegations Condemn Moskowitz’s NYC Charter Network for Possible Cheating | janresseger

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s